Expulsion & Removal Timeline.

The court reviewed, on appeal under the Wab BES, a Ministerial withdrawal of a residence permit for residence with a spouse under the Wtu BES.

Final acts under the law can be challenged in an administrative dispute.

Final acts under the law can be challenged in an administrative dispute.

New residence permit framework with an independent Residency Appeals Tribunal, in force from 14 July 2026.

Final acts under the law can be challenged in an administrative dispute.

The court reviewed, on appeal under the Wab BES, a Ministerial withdrawal of a residence permit for residence with a spouse under the Wtu BES.

The Administrative Court ruled on a request to defer a removal decision.

The court reviewed, on appeal under the Wab BES, a Ministerial withdrawal of a residence permit for residence with a spouse under the Wtu BES.

Stay on Svalbard is governed by the Regulations relating to rejection and expulsion of persons from Svalbard.

Return decisions can be appealed to court; forced expulsion requires a court decision.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

The Constitutional Tribunal upheld court review of an administrative expulsion order, after the Batllia had reduced the entry ban.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Deportation is a sovereign administrative act not subject to judicial discretion.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

The 2025 law penalised homosexual practices with two to five years, and the Justice Minister said foreign nationals would be expelled.

The Code prohibits homosexual and similar practices and lets a court expel a foreign national convicted under it.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

The Court reviewed migration measures and refugee procedures under due process and non-refoulement.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

Curaçao assesses protection requests under article 3 ECHR by ministerial policy, with appeal to the Court of First Instance and suspensive effect.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Repealed the Safety of Rwanda Act and Illegal Migration Act provisions such as the duty to remove.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

A magistrates court convicted foreign nationals and ordered their deportation.

Grounds for refusing entry; courts decide expulsion on most grounds.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

Repealed the Safety of Rwanda Act and the Illegal Migration Act duty to remove.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

Repealed the Safety of Rwanda Act and Illegal Migration Act provisions such as the duty to remove.

The Supreme Court lifted a prohibited immigrant declaration pending judicial review.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Entry prohibition and deportation grounds, with objection and administrative suit.

Deportation decisions must state the appeal route; residents are not deported before the review committee concludes.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

The 2025 decree rewrote impediments, expulsion and review rules of the Migration Law.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

Repealed the Safety of Rwanda Act and Illegal Migration Act provisions such as the duty to remove.

Power to order a foreigner not to remain in India and to bear removal costs.

The court reviewed, on appeal under the Lar, a Ministerial order of immediate expulsion under article 15 of the Ltu.

The comparative study records that expulsion decisions in French-speaking sub-Saharan states can be challenged before the administrative judge.

The comparative study records that expulsion decisions in French-speaking sub-Saharan states can be challenged before the administrative judge.

The comparative study records that expulsion decisions in French-speaking sub-Saharan states can be challenged before the administrative judge.

The comparative study records that expulsion decisions in French-speaking sub-Saharan states can be challenged before the administrative judge.

The comparative study records that expulsion decisions in French-speaking sub-Saharan states can be challenged before the administrative judge.

The comparative study records that expulsion decisions in French-speaking sub-Saharan states can be challenged before the administrative judge.

The comparative study records that expulsion decisions in French-speaking sub-Saharan states can be challenged before the administrative judge.

The comparative study records that expulsion decisions in French-speaking sub-Saharan states can be challenged before the administrative judge.

The comparative study records that expulsion decisions in French-speaking sub-Saharan states can be challenged before the administrative judge.

The comparative study records that expulsion decisions in French-speaking sub-Saharan states can be challenged before the administrative judge.

Internal review policy with judicial review in the Royal Court.

The comparative study records that expulsion decisions in French-speaking sub-Saharan states can be challenged before the administrative judge.

The comparative study records that expulsion decisions in French-speaking sub-Saharan states can be challenged before the administrative judge.

The comparative study records that expulsion decisions in French-speaking sub-Saharan states can be challenged before the administrative judge.